Determining whether a trademark is descriptive is a vital step in the registration process with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). This classification is not made in isolation but in relation to the specific goods or services the mark represents. If a trademark directly conveys characteristics, functions, or uses of a product or service, it is likely to be classified as descriptive and may not qualify for the Principal Register.
Understanding Descriptive Trademarks
The Role of Dictionary Definitions
One of the primary tools for assessing descriptiveness is a dictionary. If a term has an established meaning that clearly explains a product or service, it will likely be deemed descriptive. However, even if a term lacks a formal dictionary definition, the USPTO may still determine it is descriptive if it is widely understood within an industry.
For example, an applicant cannot assume that previously approved trademarks serve as definitive proof that a term is not descriptive. Trademark examiners evaluate marks individually, and a term that was previously accepted might later be considered descriptive as industry terminology evolves. A notable case, In re Styleclick.com Inc., demonstrated this when “VIRTUAL FASHION” was denied registration due to the growing recognition of “VIRTUAL” as a descriptive term in digital fashion services.
First Use Does Not Ensure Trademark Eligibility
Being the first entity to use a particular term does not automatically entitle an applicant to trademark registration. If the term merely describes the product or service rather than distinguishing it, the USPTO will still reject it. The core issue is whether the mark acts as a unique brand identifier or simply communicates product information.
Visual Representations and Their Impact on Descriptiveness
Trademarks can include images or symbols in addition to words. If an image directly represents the product or a primary feature of a service, it may be considered descriptive. This principle was highlighted in In re Underwater Connections, Inc., where an illustration of a compressed air gas tank was considered descriptive for a business offering underwater diving tours. Because the image directly depicted an essential component of the service, it failed to function as a distinct brand identifier.
Foreign Language Terms and Trademark Eligibility
The USPTO applies the “foreign equivalents” rule when evaluating trademarks containing non-English words. If the English translation of a foreign term is descriptive, then the foreign-language term is also considered descriptive and cannot be registered. In In re Geo. A. Hormel & Company, the word “SAPORITO” (which means “tasty” in Italian) was deemed descriptive because it conveyed a characteristic of the food products it represented. This rule prevents businesses from circumventing trademark laws by using foreign terms with the same descriptive meaning as their English counterparts.
Acronyms and Their Potential Descriptiveness
Acronyms may also be deemed descriptive if the words they represent are themselves descriptive. To assess this, examiners determine whether the acronym has a commonly recognized meaning among consumers. In In re Yacht Exchange Inc., the term “MLS” was found to be descriptive because it stood for “Multiple Listing Service,” a well-known industry term. This case highlights the need to ensure an acronym does not merely restate a descriptive phrase.
Marks That Identify the Target Audience
If a trademark explicitly identifies the intended consumer base for a product or service, it is often classified as descriptive. For instance, a name like “Senior Living Magazine” clearly indicates the target audience and would likely be considered descriptive. Similarly, marks that specify the provider of a service, such as “Smith’s Plumbing Services,” may also fail to qualify for trademark protection.
The Use of Laudatory Terms
Words that suggest superior quality, such as “BEST,” “PREMIER,” “ULTIMATE,” or “SUPERIOR,” are often found to be descriptive, especially when combined with other descriptive elements. These words typically do not serve as brand identifiers but instead convey marketing messages. For example, “The Best Coffee in New York” would likely be classified as descriptive because it promotes a product rather than distinguishing it as a unique brand.
Slogans and Their Trademark Viability
Slogans may face rejection if they primarily function as promotional statements rather than brand identifiers. To be eligible for trademark protection, a slogan must create a distinct commercial impression separate from the accompanying text or imagery. The phrase “The Best Beer in America” was denied registration because it was deemed a laudatory and descriptive statement rather than a unique brand marker.
Overcoming a Descriptive Trademark Rejection
Establishing Secondary Meaning
Although descriptive trademarks generally do not qualify for the Principal Register, businesses may still secure protection if they can prove “acquired distinctiveness” or “secondary meaning.” This means that over time, consumers have come to associate the mark with a specific company rather than just recognizing it as a descriptive term. Evidence that can help demonstrate secondary meaning includes:
- Continuous use: Using the mark in commerce for at least five years.
- Marketing efforts: Widespread advertising campaigns linking the mark to the company.
- Consumer awareness: Survey data or testimonials proving brand recognition.
- High sales volume: Demonstrating broad consumer recognition through strong sales figures.
Registering on the Supplemental Register
If a mark is considered descriptive but may acquire distinctiveness over time, businesses can opt to register it on the Supplemental Register. While this does not provide the same level of legal protection as the Principal Register, it does offer benefits such as:
- The ability to use the ® symbol
- Protection against conflicting trademarks in future registrations
- A potential path to the Principal Register once the mark gains distinctiveness
Choosing a Strong Trademark Strategy
To avoid descriptiveness issues, companies should develop inherently distinctive trademarks. The most effective trademarks fall into these categories:
- Fanciful marks: Completely invented words with no prior meaning (e.g., Xerox, Kodak).
- Arbitrary marks: Existing words used in unrelated industries (e.g., Apple for computers).
- Suggestive marks: Words that require some thought to connect with the product (e.g., Coppertone for sunscreen).
Selecting strong trademarks helps businesses avoid legal barriers and secure long-term brand protection under trademark laws for logos.
Conclusion
Understanding how trademarks are classified as descriptive is essential for businesses aiming to protect their brands. The USPTO evaluates trademarks based on their relationship to the associated goods or services, considering factors such as dictionary meanings, foreign equivalents, acronyms, laudatory terms, and intended audiences. While descriptive trademarks face challenges in obtaining registration, businesses can overcome these obstacles by demonstrating secondary meaning or registering on the Supplemental Register. Choosing a unique, distinctive mark from the outset greatly improves the likelihood of approval.
For those asking, “What is a trademark USPTO registration process?” the key takeaway is that selecting a strong, non-descriptive mark will increase the chances of securing legal protection. Whether dealing with descriptive trademarks or seeking protection for logos, understanding these legal principles is crucial for long-term brand success.
Got questions? Speak to one of our best Trademark Lawyers.